Why tobacco (the plant) deserves an honest assessment rather than radical condemnation

I'm not a proponent of smoking anything, and I don't smoke any plant or product whatsoever. Even smoking natural tobacco leaves is not good for your lungs, but smoking processed cigarettes is far, far worse. I'm publishing this article because I can't stand by and watch the FDA shamefully condemn an entire plant (tobacco) when the real culprit of all this health damage is not the plant itself but the toxic chemicals added to the plant in the manufacture of a cigarette.

Big pharma cos behind campaign against tobacco: ITGA

International Tobacco Growers Association (ITGA), which opposes some of the articles of World Health Organisation’s (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), on Tuesday alleged big pharmaceutical companies are behind the campaign.

It said this was to reduce cigarette production and thereby increase nicotine patch sales which is used to help people quit smoking.

Now, cellphones can help you quit smoking

Support for quitting smoking via text and video messages can offer a low cost solution to kick the butt, according to a new study.

A Cochrane systematic review found that people are more likely to stay away from cigarettes over a period of six months if they receive motivational messages and advice through their mobile phones.

Text messages are already used by health services to send appointment reminders and to encourage people to stick to treatment programmes.

Marlboro Red cigarette, Marlboro Gold cigarette best types in demand by most of the smokers worldwide.

And mobile phones may offer a low cost solution for delivering smoking cessation services.

Hollywood Limits Cigarette-Smoking Screen Time

Hollywood movies have undergone a lot of changes over the years, and there is one in particular that some people may not have thought of comparing or looking into: screen-time devoted to smoking.

A feature on Time.com shared the contents of a report released on Thursday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which showed that there has been a significant reduction in the number of scenes that involved cigarettes and smoking over the past five years.

The downward trend has been attributed in part to three major motion picture companies, which have enforced polices to limit the use of tobacco products onscreen in movies that are aimed at young audiences.

The study, published in the CDC regular bulletin Morbidity and Mortality Weekly report, revealed that the top-grossing movies of 2010 contained less than half as many scenes involving tobacco, when compared against those of 2005. The difference is even more pronounced among movies classified as youth-rated – encompassing movies that receive G, PG, or PG-13 ratings – which saw a 71.6 percent decline in “tobacco incidents,” from 2,093 in 2005 to 595 in 2010.

The term “tobacco incident” was defined as any onscreen “use or implied use of a tobacco product by an actor,” while a new “incident” begins any time the camera cuts to, or back to, an actor who is using a tobacco product, or any time a tobacco product is lit onscreen.

These incidents are counted by “Thumbs Up! Thumbs Down!”, a California group. The group counts these incidents in any movie that is ranked as among the top-grossing movies in the U.S. in a single calendar week.

Philip Morris sues over Australian plans to ban logos from cigarette packets

The tobacco giant Philip Morris has launched legal action against the Australian government over the country's plans to strip company logos from cigarette packages and replace them with grisly images of cancerous mouths, sickly children and bulging, blinded eyes.

The government believes the rules will make the packages less attractive to smokers and turn Australia into the world's toughest country on tobacco advertising. Several cigarette makers have threatened lawsuits, arguing the move illegally diminishes the value of their trademarks. Philip Morris , producer of Virginia cigarettes and Marlboro Gold brand is the first to file a claim for compensation.

"We would anticipate that the compensation would amount to billions," said a Philip Morris spokeswoman, Anne Edwards.

The legislation, which will be introduced to parliament in July, would ban cigarette makers from printing their logos, promotional text or colourful images on packs. Brand names would instead be printed in small type and feature large health warnings and gruesome, full-colour images of the consequences of smoking. The law would be phased in over six months, starting in January 2012.

Hong Kong-based Philip Morris Asia Limited, which owns the Australian affiliate Philip Morris Limited, filed a notice of claim on Monday arguing the legislation violates a bilateral investment treaty between Australia and Hong Kong.

The tobacco company says the treaty protects companies' property, including intellectual property such as trademarks. The plain packaging would severely diminish the value of the company's trademark, Edwards said.

"Our brands are really one of the absolute key valuable assets that we have as a company. It's what helps us compete, it's what enables us to distinguish our products," she said. "This move ... would essentially amount to confiscation of our brand in Australia."

The government denied the proposal breaks any laws and said it would not back down.

"Our government is determined to take every step we can to reduce the harm by tobacco," the health minister, Nicola Roxon, said. "We won't be deterred by tobacco companies making threats or taking legal action."

The Australian prime minister, Julia Gillard, also brushed off Philip Morris's threats. "We are not going to be intimidated by big tobacco's tactics," she told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.

The legal notice filed on Monday opens a three-month period of negotiation between the two sides. Philip Morris said if a "satisfactory outcome" was not achieved by the end of the three months, it would seek arbitration.